It works quite well actually. The point of my comment wasn't to expose my stupidity, or yours, but to simply make the point that there's more than just "windows" servers being used... In real production too. :')
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:43:48 -0500 "Alex K. Angelopoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This may be stretching, but I have a hunch the Linux (x86) choice will run on > Linux...<g> > > On Tuesday, 2002-09-24 16:25 [GMT+0100=CET], > Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 15:40:34 +0100 (BST) Tristan Richardson > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> RealVNC is pleased to announce the release of version 3.3.4 of VNC > >> for both Windows and Unix platforms. > >> > >> Binaries and source can be downloaded from the RealVNC website at > >> http://www.realvnc.com > >> > >> This release is completely compatible with previous versions. There > >> are many bug fixes and several significant new features, including: > >> > >> * vastly improved low-bandwidth performance > >> * automatic protocol selection based on line speed > >> * efficient multi-viewer ("classroom") support on the Windows > >> server > >> > > > > What about Linux servers? > _______________________________________________ > VNC-List mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list -- ****************************************************************************** Registered Linux User Number 185956 http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net 7:27pm up 196 days, 36 min, 6 users, load average: 1.77, 1.91, 1.89 _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
