Ah... I thought you passing them a bonk on the head for saying "Unix" and not "Linux".
On Tuesday, 2002-09-24 18:51 [GMT+0100=CET], Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It works quite well actually. The point of my comment wasn't to > expose my stupidity, or yours, but to simply make the point that > there's more than just "windows" servers being used... In real > production too. :') > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:43:48 -0500 "Alex K. Angelopoulos" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This may be stretching, but I have a hunch the Linux (x86) choice >> will run on Linux...<g> >> >> On Tuesday, 2002-09-24 16:25 [GMT+0100=CET], >> Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 15:40:34 +0100 (BST) Tristan Richardson >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> RealVNC is pleased to announce the release of version 3.3.4 of VNC >>>> for both Windows and Unix platforms. >>>> >>>> Binaries and source can be downloaded from the RealVNC website at >>>> http://www.realvnc.com >>>> >>>> This release is completely compatible with previous versions. >>>> There are many bug fixes and several significant new features, >>>> including: >>>> >>>> * vastly improved low-bandwidth performance >>>> * automatic protocol selection based on line speed >>>> * efficient multi-viewer ("classroom") support on the Windows >>>> server >>>> >>> >>> What about Linux servers? >> _______________________________________________ >> VNC-List mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
