> with a post that is nothing but flames, without a shred of technical > content?
No it is quite technical How compatible art thay - the real question is ! How compatible are they is the real question ? I once tried another vnc-flavor and when my other side did'nt successfully fall back on the default protocol I left it Thats all to say remember compatibility and the plugin structure will allow a compatibility layer We arte in Object Age cheers Tobias ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Kaufmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dustin Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jerry McBride" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "RealVNC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 20:39 Subject: Re: Is Ultra VNC born? > At 021209 19:49 -0800, Dustin Johnson wrote: > > >What's your deal, McBride? Either you don't really know what you are talking > >about and are simply falling into the group of bashing windowz to hide your > >insecurities or you are just mean. > > Dustin, why in the world would you jump into a thread - after Wez has > warned against flaming, specifically with respect to this topic - > with a post that is nothing but flames, without a shred of technical > content? I have my own views on the matter, which I will be happy to > share off-list, if you like [the world need not be bothered with > them], but IAC I would rest those views on facts, without resort to > personal invective. > > If you respond to this on-list, I will not reply. I only write now, > with reluctance, in the hope of averting a puerile flame war from > what began as a reasonable comment. > -- > John > _______________________________________________ > VNC-List mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
