[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> <snip>
>>This is contrary to the statements made by Joel Bomgaars when asked about
>>the license of ExpertVNC:
>>"The scripts and executables of ExpertVNC that are completely separate
>>files are licensed separately under a generic restrictive license."
>>http://www.realvnc.com/pipermail/vnc-list/2003-May/039005.html
>
>>From your discription they are not seperate files, but part of the same
>>executable.  As the GPL FAQ states:
>>"If the modules are included in the same executable file, they are
>>definitely combined in one program."
>>http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation
> </snip>
>
> They look like they come bundled in a self extracting executable, just as
> if they were winzipped then created as a self extracting zip.
> When you run it, it extracts them, and runs. If I were to say zip all the
> VNC files up, with a text file with some notes on it or
> something, then create a self extracting zip, and email it to a friend!
> Would that break the licensing? How does this work with the
> GPL?
>

I'm not a GPL expert either, but I believe you are describing two
different things.  A self extracting zip I think would be covered under
"Mere aggregation" (This is Tridia's model):
Mere aggregation of two programs means putting them side by side on the
same CD-ROM or hard disk. We use this term in the case where they are
separate programs, not parts of a single program. In this case, if one of
the programs is covered by the GPL, it has no effect on the other program.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation

The self-extracting zip is basically just the "CD-ROM or hard disk" in
this case (just a container).

However, if you actually run a file, and in the background it extracts GPL
files to use, I think you are on a very shaky ground.  At least from the
user's point of view that looks like one program, not multiple programs.

These questions could probably be answered much better by the FSF.  I
don't know if they have a place to submit GPL questions, but I imagine
they do.  I hesitate to bring the FSF into this question until something
is heard from the RealVNC folks on the issue.  For all I know they could
have licensed the VNC code to these folks using a different license
(highly unlikely, but possible).

--
William Hooper
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list

Reply via email to