> -----Original Message----- > From: Ted LeBlanc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > What is the difference between Real VNC and TightVNC?
>From my point of view: Origionally, there was an AT&T lab in the UK that started developing vnc. After the lab closed, the development is taken over by Real VNC. Somewhere on the line, TightVNC split off to do what they want to do with it. At this point in time, I see it as follows: RealVNC sticks to the origional and provides a realy good, rock solid vnc implementation that works on all platforms, where only the platforms are the limitation. TightVNC is one of the development split-offs. These split-offs develop stuff like new compression algorithms, some security aditionals. THese kind of like to all platforms. Then there are also split-offs that develop aditional features at the cost of support for roughly half the target platforms. CBee _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
