> -----Original Message----- > From: A.Bhuvaneswaran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:28 AM > To: Seak, Teng-Fong > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: realvnc & screen saver > > > Is it really so important to have a remote screen saver be played > correctly > in local computer? Seriously, if nobody is before the screen, does it > matter > if it's a colorful screen saver or just a blank screen? > > > > Point. In a real time, screen saver or blank screen, it does not matter. > > But, here i am testing the real vnc before using it for my application. > I chose to test it with screen saver, since there exist lot of random > screen updations. If it can perform better here, i will be very happy to > choose realvnc for my application. [Kelly Hickel] The problem is that the goal of a screen saver (don't leave any one pixel the same color for very long) really doesn't apply to very many real world applications.....
-Kelly > > -- > Regards, > A.Bhuvaneswaran > > [demime 0.99d.1 removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature > which had a name of signature.asc] > _______________________________________________ > VNC-List mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To remove yourself from the list visit: > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
