I don't get the point ......
Whatever your application is, when the screensaver is up, that means the
system has been idle for some time, and that means your application hasn't been used
for some time and whatever is drawn on the screen isn't visible because the screen is
"occupied" by the screensaver!
And when the user comes back to his computer (and uses your application), and
once he moves the mouse or press a key, the screensaver will go away. It won't
certainly not go away immediately because the system needs probably to recover some
stacked memory from the swap and refresh all active windows, but the screensaver will
certainly go away.
Sorry, but there's really no point of thinking VNC and screen saver. I'll
stop here and if anyone wants to comment pro & con on this matter, feel free to do so
:)
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : A.Bhuvaneswaran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyi : mardi 25 mai 2004 15:28
> @ : Seak, Teng-Fong
> Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : RE: realvnc & screen saver
>
>
> > Is it really so important to have a remote screen saver be played correctly in
> > local
> computer? Seriously, if nobody is before the screen, does it matter if it's a
> colorful screen
> saver or just a blank screen?
> >
>
> Point. In a real time, screen saver or blank screen, it does not matter.
>
> But, here i am testing the real vnc before using it for my application.
> I chose to test it with screen saver, since there exist lot of random
> screen updations. If it can perform better here, i will be very happy to
> choose realvnc for my application.
>
> --
> Regards,
> A.Bhuvaneswaran
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
