Well, yes :), memory mismatch Pedro.
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:20:42 +0200, Pedro Fortuny Ayuso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just tested several setups for a friend's Gigabit connection between > a Win2000 vnc server > (P4 1.4GHz) and a MacOS X (G4 Powerbook, probably 1.33GHz) client. > > I found out that > a) ultravnc gives me the best performance as server (with its own > driver and with hardware acceleration disabled) > b) VNCThing gives me (and remarkably) the best performance as client. > I found out a "double > buffer local display" in the options which speeds things up VERY much... > c) disabling compression is best for performance. > > (My friend is a doctor and needs real-time and no 3d -radiographies, > things like that-, so that's why I used those settings among other > things). > > As a matter of fact, one can use Corel Photopaint 11 with a > full-colour 360x360dpi fotograph (about 150x150mm size) and using a > tablet as pointer with a very tiny delay (so it is quite quite > usable). > > The problem is: > VNCThing is discontinued (or at least looks like), the client I > downloaded is from 2002 or even before. I tried REALVnc, TightVNC and > Chicken of the VNC and found them all quite slower with the same > settings (when available). > > Is there anything I may have missed in other Mac clients? Is there > something similar to that framebuffering in other clients? > > Thanks and sorry for the long post. > > Pedro > -- > Pedro Fortuny Ayuso > Colegio Mayor Peqafiel > C/Estudios 6. 47005 Valladolid. SPAIN > http://pfortuny.sdf-eu.org > -- Pedro Fortuny Ayuso Colegio Mayor Peqafiel C/Estudios 6. 47005 Valladolid. SPAIN http://pfortuny.sdf-eu.org _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
