On Sunday 04 December 2005 02:58 pm, Rex Dieter wrote: > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > I found that Real to Real gives me what *seems* to be an even faster > > connection than Tight to Real (at least a Tight Server & Real Viewer). > > When, when you said you had used Real, most assumed you meant on both ends.
I thought it was, too. It wasn't until someone pointed this out to me that I realized the 2 setups I had used recently that I thought might be slower were mixed system. > > > So my best guess is that I was using some systems with a mixed > > server/viewer situation, and THAT seems to effect the connection. > > Absolutely. Tight doesn't support Real's RLE compression, and Real > doesn't support Tight compression, so when mixed server/viewer falls > back to a non-compressed compatibility mode. > > So in short, try your best to avoid mixing, and you'll be better off. Thanks -- now that I'm clear on that (and realized it was not my imagination), that'll be easy to do. Hal _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
