Funciono, espero me envien las datos sobre el manejo del vnc, gracias .

2006/1/31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Send VNC-List mailing list submissions to
>        [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of VNC-List digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. RE: Session encryption (James Weatherall)
>   2. RE: Screen size (John Aldrich)
>   3. Re: session encryption (Martin =?iso-8859-15?Q?K=F6gler?=)
>   4. 10060 (Rick Mitchell)
>   5. Re: 10060 (Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor)
>   6. RE: VNCViewer won't run on Debian Unstable (James Weatherall)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> From: "James Weatherall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Stephen Fromm'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Session encryption
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:00:21 -0000
> Organization: RealVNC Ltd.
>
> Stephen,
>
> Session security involves more than just encrypting the data.  The session
> security provided by VNC Enterprise & Personal Editions encrypts the data
> to
> prevent anyone able to "snoop" the network from being able to read the
> session stream, as well as tamper-proofing to prevent harmful
> session-rewrite attacks, protection from brute force attacks, server
> identity verification, etc.
>
> The most basic reason for using encryption is because otherwise strings of
> key-presses can be snooped and used to obtain any passwords that were
> typed
> in to the server from the viewer.
>
> On modern processors, encryption is pretty much unnoticable in most cases,
> but it does depend on the amount of data being encrypted, and on the speed
> of the host system.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Fromm
> > Sent: 28 January 2006 14:22
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Session encryption
> >
> > The non-free editions of VNC offer session encryption.
> >
> > If the data in my VNC session isn't all that confidential, do
> > I really need
> > session encryption?
> >
> > For example, suppose someone intercepts/hijacks/whatever my
> > VNC session.
> > Clearly, any password I type during the session would thus be
> > available to
> > the attacker in cleartext.  But suppose I don't do that, and
> > there's nothing
> > in the datastream in the VNC session that's proprietary,
> > confidential, etc.
> > Could the attacker use the hijacked VNC session to gain
> > access to the host
> > I've connected to?  (Viz, the host that the VNC server is running on.)
> >
> > Finally, how expensive is encryption (and decryption) in terms of CPU?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > SJF
> > _______________________________________________
> > VNC-List mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To remove yourself from the list visit:
> > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> From: John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Richard Friedlander'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Screen size
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:06:14 -0500
>
> VNC Viewer displays the actual size of the remote desktop. Increase the
> size
> of the server's desktop and VNC Viewer will increase the size of the
> image.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Richard Friedlander
> Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 8:37 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Screen size
>
>
> I recently downloaded the free version of VNC but have one small problem.
> The image size on the client is smaller than the actual size of my laptop
> screen.  when I go to full screen size mode, all I get is a huge black
> boarder.
>
> Is there any way to increase the size of the image?
>
> Rick
> _______________________________________________
> VNC-List mailing list
> [email protected]
> To remove yourself from the list visit:
> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:47:53 +0100
> From: Martin =?iso-8859-15?Q?K=F6gler?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: session encryption
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 12:00:01PM +0000,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 12:47:14 -0800
> > To: [email protected]
> > From: Dave Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: session encryption
> >
> > >The non-free editions of VNC offer session encryption.
> >
> > There is also ZVNC, which is free.  The downside of ZVNC is
> > that it is PC only, and out of date with respect
> > to the current vnc sources.
> >         http://home.comcast.net/~davedyer/znc/zvnc.html
> >
>
> For closed user groups, you can compile Realvnc 4.1.1 with my TLS patches:
> http://www.auto.tuwien.ac.at/~mkoegler/index.php/tlsvnc
>
> It adds support for complete session encryption and server
> authentification
> and works with the Linux, Windows and Java version.
>
> mfg Martin Kvgler
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> From: "Rick Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: 10060
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:28:14 -0600
>
> have a client who has a vpn from the office to his house and to my house.
>
> lan at office is 192.168.1.x
>
> his house 192.168.2.x
>
> my house 192.168.4.x
>
> I can hit all the machines on the 192.168.1.x lan
>
> he can only hit one of them.  The other gives 10060 error.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:44:36 -0800
> From: Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Rick Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: 10060
> Cc: [email protected]
>
> TCP or UDP?
>
> On 1/30/06, Rick Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  have a client who has a vpn from the office to his house and to my
> house.
> >
> > lan at office is 192.168.1.x
> >
> > his house 192.168.2.x
> >
> > my house 192.168.4.x
> >
> > I can hit all the machines on the 192.168.1.x lan
> >
> > he can only hit one of them.  The other gives 10060 error.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> > _______________________________________________
>
> >
>
>
> --
> Robert Q Kim, Wireless Internet Advisor
> http://evdo-coverage.com/cellular-repeater.html
> http://hsdpa-coverage.com
>
> 2611 S. Pacific Coast Highway 101
> Suite 102
> Cardiff by the Sea, CA 92007
> 206 984 0880
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> From: "James Weatherall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Hal Vaughan'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: VNCViewer won't run on Debian Unstable
> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:52:07 -0000
> Organization: RealVNC Ltd.
>
> Hal,
>
> Debian will have some sort of libc6 compatibility package called something
> like "libc-compat" or similar, that will provide the missing library.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Vaughan
> > Sent: 28 January 2006 05:45
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: VNCViewer won't run on Debian Unstable
> >
> > I had to upgrade my workstation recently and am using Debian
> > Unstable for
> > several reasons.  Basically, for this computer, using stable
> > is not an
> > option.
> >
> > I just reinstalled RealVNC.  The server runs fine, but when I
> > try to run
> > vncviewer, I get this:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ vncviewer
> > vncviewer: error while loading shared libraries:
> > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3:
> > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> >
> > I know there's been some kind of issue in Debian about
> > handling the upgrade
> > with the changes in C libraries, but I know very little about
> > C and am not
> > sure what package would contain this program or if it
> > conflicts with other
> > libraries.
> >
> > Is anyone else out there getting it to work on Debian Unstable?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Hal
> > _______________________________________________
> > VNC-List mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To remove yourself from the list visit:
> > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> VNC-List mailing list
>
>
> [email protected]
>
>
> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
>
>
>
>
> End of VNC-List Digest
>



--
EMPRESA COMPUTACIONAL
CABEL-INTEL
9-4721309 - 8-2794454
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[email protected]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list

Reply via email to