On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 11:00:00AM +0100, James Weatherall wrote: > Peter Rosin wrote: > > Side note: a certain Windows only "VNC" client is a true pest when you > > are implementing a server and want to be compatible, that for sure > > took some workarounds (Oh great, you can do 3.8, then I want 3.4, > > oh and 3.4 means that I will do this and that and whatnot. What crap). > > The companion server in said "VNC" suite is more friendly. > > How do other true VNC servers handle this rouge client? > > The only valid RFB protocol versions at present are 3.3, 3.7, 3.8 and 4.0, > so the "VNC viewer" that you're referring that reports RFB 3.4 isn't > actually VNC-compatible.
I know, but e.g. the RealVNC free edition server 4.1.2 doesn't bail when a (broken) client requests 3.4, I was wondering if it did anything else to accomodate the (broken) client than treat it as if 3.3 had been requested? Any pointers to where (when perhaps?) I can find the 4.0 spec? Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
