James,

Thanks for the answer.Actually i meant to ask where to modifies the
code so that we should not provide port number and there should not be any
limit on port and thus display numbers.

Thanks,
Paresh


----- Original
Message ----
From: James Weatherall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: PARESH MASANI
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 January,
2008 10:25:55 PM
Subject: RE: Maximum number of displays limit reached
Paresh,

The "vncserver" command used to launch VNC desktops will only check
the
first 100 display numbers, allowing up to 100 desktops via automatic
display-number allocation.  However, you can explicitly provide a display
number to "vncserver", e.g:

vncserver :301

will start a new server on X
display :201.

Note that becuase the VNC, Java-viewer HTTP & X11 ports are
only 100 apart,
you will want to jump in blocks of 300 ports each time, to
avoid clashes.

Cheers,

--
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd


> -----Original Message-----
>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of PARESH MASANI
> Sent: 23 January 2008 15:54
> To:
[email protected]
> Subject: Maximum number of displays limit reached
> 
>
Hi,
> 
> I came to know that Real VNC supports only 99 sessions per 
> host.
and after that it displays error saying "no free 
> display number on
machine".Could anyone have the same problem 
> or knows how to solve this then
please let me know.
> 
> Thanks,
> Paresh
> 
> 
>      Share files, take
polls, and discuss your passions - 
> all under one roof. Go to
http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups 
>
_______________________________________________
> VNC-List mailing list
>
[email protected]
> To remove yourself from the list visit:
>
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
>


      Forgot the famous
last words? Access your message archive online at
http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[email protected]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list

Reply via email to