Hi Paresh, > >>through from 1..1000 > should work, > But i saw that in C++ code in hostandport.h and some > vncExt.cc file, this same check is there to return a port > number. Will it not make any difference?
I think the code you're referring to is used when Xvnc is launched from inetd & therefore can't rely on vncserver having allocated a display for it. > >> numbers with each block being > >>300 ports apart, e.g. > 1..99,300..399,600..699 and so on > Why ports are 300 aparts. is any particular reason there? The RFB ports start from 5900, the HTTP java viewer ports from 5800, and the X11 ports from 6000. It's therefore necessary to "skip" by 300 ports such that the next 100 VNC servers use ports 6100+ for HTTP, 6200+ for RFB, 6300+ for X11 and so-on. > >> The "vncserver" program is actually a wrapper around "Xvnc", > I also read that there are so many Xvnc available in real > vnc.What is that all about in brief. Sorry, I'm afraid I don't know what you mean by that! Regards, -- Wez @ RealVNC Ltd _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
