>>The RFB ports start from 5900, the HTTP java viewer ports from 5800, and the
>>X11 ports from 6000.  It's therefore necessary to "skip" by 300 ports such
>>that the next 100 VNC servers use ports 6100+ for HTTP, 6200+ for RFB, 6300+
>>r X11 and so-on.

James,

Could you tell me if I want to modify the code
such that ports(RFB,HTTP amd VNC server) should not conflict and should
support 200 sessions instead of 100 sessions limit.The thing is if i modify
just vncserver script then it will able to generate the ports i wants but what
about the JAVA viewer port? To make chanege only in vncserver script will
generate VNC server port and allow to create sessions on servers. but to
display those sessions we need to have JAVA viewer port also so could you tell
me how to do this? I figured out that i could create the session but not able
to display on my screen using vncviwer.

 And i think the ports should not be
conflict with other process that will be taken by checking whether port is
free or not. Am i correct?




----- Original Message ----
From: James
Weatherall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: PARESH MASANI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, 24 January, 2008 11:39:59 PM
Subject: RE:
VNC Server perl script and C++ Code

Hi Paresh,

> >>through from 1..1000
>
should work,
> But i saw that in C++ code in hostandport.h and some 
>
vncExt.cc file, this same check is there to return a port 
> number. Will it
not make any difference?

I think the code you're referring to is used when
Xvnc is launched from
inetd & therefore can't rely on vncserver having
allocated a display for it.

> >> numbers with each block being
> >>300 ports
apart, e.g.
> 1..99,300..399,600..699 and so on
> Why ports are 300 aparts. is
any particular reason there?

The RFB ports start from 5900, the HTTP java
viewer ports from 5800, and the
X11 ports from 6000.  It's therefore necessary
to "skip" by 300 ports such
that the next 100 VNC servers use ports 6100+ for
HTTP, 6200+ for RFB, 6300+
for X11 and so-on.

> >> The "vncserver" program is
actually a wrapper around "Xvnc",
> I also read that there are so many Xvnc
available in real 
> vnc.What is that all about in brief.

Sorry, I'm afraid I
don't know what you mean by that!

Regards,

--
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd


      Meet
people who discuss and share your passions. Go to
http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[email protected]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list

Reply via email to