>>(Just out of interest, has anyone on this list any experience of using
>>a Windows VNC server on a 386? How bad is it?)
>>
>>Adrian
>
>I wouldn't imagine many people have tried running windows '95 on a 386, let
>alone VNC! I get the impression from this forum, and website, that win 3.1
>isn't supported.
>
>I do know what '95 on a 486/66 is like (not too bad, though I haven't tried
>VNC!) and I've tried running linux and VNC on a 486/100 which was a bit
>sluggish, so I'd project that if you did get windows and vnc onto a 386, it
>would be very painful. Main problem with 386's is lack of memory - I think
>they can support 16mb, but that won't be common. A pentium with only 4mb of
>RAM is going to be pretty slow as well!
WinVNC on a 386 isn't very sensible, no. I have been using Xvnc on a
486DX/25 though - that is painful enough, even with the ultra-lightweight
FVWM2 window manager. RAM wasn't particularly the problem.
--------------------------------------------------------------
from: Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not for attachments)
big-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uni-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it.
Get VNC Server for Macintosh from http://www.chromatix.uklinux.net/vnc/
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.12
GCS$/E/S dpu(!) s:- a19 C+++ UL++ P L+++ E W+ N- o? K? w--- O-- M++$ V? PS
PE- Y+ PGP++ t- 5- X- R !tv b++ DI+++ D G e+ h+ r- y+
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
