Hmm. Okay. I don't use the Linux version of the viewer myself, I mostly go the other direction.
-----Original Message----- From: Boon Yeo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is VNC still being worked on? "David Brodbeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Any particular reason you can't just use TightVNC? I've been using it for > quite a while now and it seems to be every bit as stable as the "official" > AT&T version. I beg to differ. For some reasons, TightVNC viewer kept crashing on my Redhat 7.1 box. I had to "regress" to the "official" AT&T version. Perhaps the Win98 server screen size of 1280x1024 pixels is too large for the RH 7.1 viewer sceen size 1024x768 pixels. Now I am running TightVNC server on the Win98 and AT&T VNC viewer on the RH 7.1. Seems to be working fine. -B --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
