"David Brodbeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Any particular reason you can't just use TightVNC?  I've been using it for
> quite a while now and it seems to be every bit as stable as the "official"
> AT&T version.

I beg to differ.  For some reasons, TightVNC viewer
kept crashing on my Redhat 7.1 box.  I had to "regress"
to the "official" AT&T version.  Perhaps the Win98
server screen size of 1280x1024 pixels is too large
for the RH 7.1 viewer sceen size 1024x768 pixels.
Now I am running TightVNC server on the Win98
and AT&T VNC viewer on the RH 7.1.  Seems to
be working fine.

-B
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line:
'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to