On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Carlos Alvarez wrote:
I agree with you, and I'd ask the carrier to remove that. It sounds like
you haven't asked yet. The whole thing is highly negotiable anyway, since
it wasn't an actual cost to them. You might even get them to drop it or
severely reduce the overage based on future business.
I've asked -- this email is verbatim what I sent to them. Their response:
"We consider the minimum commitment to make up for services that were not
utilized during the usage period. Therefore all taxes and regulatory fees
associated with the service/product will also apply to the minimum
commitment fee on your invoice."
But that isn't how the FCC requirements read.
The frustrating part -- engaging a lawyer is likely more expensive than
simply giving up. And leaving the carrier hurts my business. And this is
only a one-time issue, not an ongoing billing dispute.
I'm quite confident that the USF shouldn't be billed on this non-telecom
fee, and I can get a lawyer involved and they'll capitulate, but it will
likely create bad blood plus I'll lose money on the process.
I really really dispise companies not taking ownership of issues and just
blinding standing ground. It makes me wish there were more telecom
companies that highly regarded customer service like Zappos.
Beckman
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
[email protected] http://www.angryox.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
