Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Self-Hating [X]s:

   I've always been annoyed by the way many people use the term
   "self-hating [X]," usually "self-hating Jew" but often in other
   contexts. Here are three reasons, two general and one specific to a
   particular usage I've seen:

   1. "Hating": Often, the person being accused shows little evidence of
   "hating" anyone -- he's criticizing them, maybe he's being unfair to
   them, but it doesn't follow that he hates them. Labeling disagreement
   with a group, or even erroneous disagreement, as "hatred" (widely
   thought to be a highly reprehensible emotion, unless the target is
   genuinely evil) strikes me as unfair and misleading: It's argument by
   epithet, rather than by providing evidence.

   The criticisms of George Soros as a supposedly "self-hating Jew" are a
   classic example -- I have no reason to think that Soros hates Jews (or
   his own Jewishness). One can certainly criticize statements he's made
   about Jews; but calling them expressions of hatred is simply
   unfounded, unless one can point to some substantial evidence that they
   do indeed flow from hatred. (Nor is it enough to just say that similar
   statements have been made by people who hate Jews; that some
   anti-Catholic bigots, for instance, criticize Catholicism out of
   hatred, doesn't mean that everyone who criticizes Catholicism is
   equally hateful.)

   2. "Self": That someone hates some group is already a pretty serious
   allegation, which requires some serious evidence to support it. But
   saying that he's self-hating makes him look not just hateful, but
   pathetic and contemptible -- he doesn't just hate Jews, but he hates
   himself, because he hates his own Jewish side. The characterization
   sounds not just like a moral criticism, but a psychiatric diagnosis.

   Yet it seems to me to be empty pop psychology at best. One can
   disapprove of the religious or ethnic group into which one was born
   without disliking oneself. In fact, coming from a group may give one a
   particularly good view (though it may also give one a distorted view)
   of the weaknesses and errors of many group members. It may well be
   wrong for people to overgeneralize, and to come to dislike Jews,
   Catholics, Armenians, or whoever else as groups because they dislike a
   lot of their fellow Jews, Catholics, or Armenians in their family,
   neighborhood, or social circle. But this dislike of a group hardly
   translates into dislike of oneself.

   3. [X]: Finally, one recent set of "self-hating" references just
   further illustrates how this phrase can delude people -- people
   calling Michelle Malkin a "self-hating Asian."

   Now I'm very glad that there's been a serious debate about the merits
   of Malkin's work (including, quite prominently, by Eric Muller while
   guest-blogging on this very blog). But the debate is not advanced by
   illogical name-calling.

   "Asian" is a funny sort of term, which purports to cover a madly
   heterogenous group of people from Japan to the Philippines to Burma
   and (in many contexts) India and Pakistan. Many whites and some
   American Asians may see the group as "Asian." My sense is that most
   Asians and many American Asians do not; they see the group as Chinese,
   Japanese, Filipinos, and so on.

   Michelle Malkin is the child of Filipino immigrants. She is writing a
   book that is defending the internment of Japanese-Americans. Other
   than being from the same huge part of the world, and having similar
   eye shapes and hair colors, Filipinos and Japanese have little in
   common with each other. It's true that racists have often lumped the
   two together, and that the hostility towards (and often hatred of)
   Japanese immigrants during World War II flowed partly from general
   hostility to Asians. But it also flowed, of course, from matters
   peculiar to the Japanese.

   So even if one could somehow show that Malkin is motivated by hatred
   of people of Japanese extraction -- and I have no reason to believe
   that this is true, and I accept it only to separate the various parts
   of my argument -- the "self-" coupled with the "Asian" in the phrase
   "self-hating Asian" is especially nonsensical. To be accurate (again,
   assuming for a moment that some hatred is involved) rather than an
   illogical smear, the assertion would have to be
   "World-War-II-era-Japanese-hating Filipina" (where Japanese is used to
   include "of Japanese extraction," as are "Filipina" and "Asian"). To
   be still more accurate, absent any evidence of hatred, it would have
   to be "World-War-II-era-Japanese-internment-defending Filipina." A
   somewhat different-sounding criticism than "self-hating Asian," no?

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to