Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Oral sex in the armed forces:

   [1]United States v. Marcum, just decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals
   for the Armed Forces, (1) declines to decide whether the Lawrence v.
   Texas right to sexual autonomy generally applies to members of the
   armed forces, and (2) holds that a noncommissioned officer can be
   punished for engaging in nonforcible oral sex with a subordinate.

   Though the allegations in the case involved nonforcible but
   nonconsensual sex (the defendant was supposedly performing oral sex on
   the subordinate as the subordinate was waking up), I don't believe the
   military verdict specifically found absence of consent. Therefore, as
   I read it, the court's reasoning focused on the hierarchical
   relationship between the parties rather than absence of consent, and
   is thus generally applicable to any oral or anal sex (heterosexual or
   homosexual) between a defendant servicemember and another
   servicemember over whom the defendant has supervisory authority.

References

   1. http://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/opinions/2004Term/02-0944.pdf

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to