Posted by Jim Lindgren:
John Lott and the National Research Council's Report.--

   I was away when the story broke about the National Research Council
   releasing its report on the effects of gun laws on violence, though I
   saw [1]Stuart Benjamin's nice post on it when I returned. The focus of
   Stuart's comments were the report's criticisms of John Lott's work,
   though he also mentioned my role in [2]investigating whether a 1997
   study that Lott says he did was ever actually done. As those of you
   who have been [3]following this might remember, [4]I thought that
   [5]Ayres and [6]Donohue did an excellent job of data analysis on the
   issue of the effect of carry laws on crime rates.

   I read through much of the report, including particularly [7]chapter 6
   that is critical of Lott's work, the [8]dissent to part of that
   chapter by James Q. Wilson, and the [9]majority response to that
   dissent.

   From the portions that I have read, I found the report sober,
   impressive, and fair, though there are substantial parts of this
   literature that I am unfamiliar with. As to Lott's work, I actually
   thought that the Council's report was too generous to his work in
   spots. In particular, I thought that it failed to point out just how
   much Lott's results are driven by poorly executed demographic
   controls, a point that Ayres and Donohue make effectively in their
   Stanford exchange. While the Council's report raises a lot of
   questions about Lott's use of control variables in general,
   particularly in its [10]Appendix D, the Report does not seem to focus
   on the degree to these questionable demographic controls determine
   some of Lott's results.

   As usual, Tim Lambert has the [11]most thorough [12]coverage on the
   [13]report.

References

   1. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2004_12_14.shtml#1103336454
   2. http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~lambert/guns/lindgren.html
   3. http://www.instapundit.com/archives/011591.php
   4. http://www.instapundit.com/archives/011786.php#011786
   5. http://islandia.law.yale.edu/ayers/Ayres_Donohue_article.pdf
   6. http://islandia.law.yale.edu/ayers/Ayres_Donohue_comment.pdf
   7. http://books.nap.edu/books/0309091241/html/120.html
   8. http://books.nap.edu/books/0309091241/html/269.html
   9. http://www.nap.edu/openbook/0309091241/html/269.html#pagetop
  10. http://books.nap.edu/books/0309091241/html/299.html
  11. http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~lambert/cgi-bin/blog/2004/12#naspanel3
  12. http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~lambert/cgi-bin/blog/2004/12#naspanel2
  13. http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~lambert/cgi-bin/blog/2004/12#naspanel

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to