Posted by Eugene Volokh:
More from Xoxohth:

   (Say, wasn't that a character I used to run when I was a Dungeons &
   Dragons player in high school?)

     Prof. Volokh,

     We were just informed about your blog post today about
     anti-semitism and racism on the site (your blog entry is being
     discussed at
     [1]http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=147012&forum_id=2).

     We think your assessment was accurate: those threads are a very
     small fraction of the site, and even in those threads the
     overwhelming majority of posters are responding to the racists
     harshly. However, there are some additional points we'd like to
     make:

     1) The site is clearly divided into on-topic and off-topic filters.
     We are very strong believers in the freedom of expression and the
     marketplace of ideas. This is why we allow off-topic discussion and
     almost never censor content, no matter how abhorrent it may be.
     However, we understand that not everyone wants to be exposed to
     such discussions. Some might simply want to browse the site for
     threads directly relating to law school, employment, etc. Go
     figure. Hence the on-topic/off-topic filters � the default option
     is on-topic mode, and in order to see the offensive material in
     question, one has to pro-actively enter off-topic ("expert") mode.
     If an individual does not want to be exposed to discussion of
     politics, sports, or racism, all that individual has to do to avoid
     99+% of that content is stay in school-related mode.

     2) That said, some posts do slip through the cracks. We trust our
     users to classify threads as school-related or off-topic, and
     although the overwhelming majority classifies their threads
     appropriately, on a daily basis you can expect at least one or two
     threads to slip through the cracks. This is usually not a big deal,
     but over a period of months it can add up, as you can see by the
     number of threads that appear in school-related mode when you
     search for racist terms. However, keep in mind that typical users
     are not going to see a flood of those threads when they go to the
     site. The only time you'll see twenty or so racist threads on the
     site is if you proactively search for them, which is what your
     colleague took upon himself to do when he used the search box to
     search the entire site specifically for those various racist terms
     he came up with.

     3) The very reason our student-run community has been so much more
     phenomenally successful than all of its competitors, in its single
     year of existence, is that it respects the merits of the free,
     uninhibited exchange of ideas. In fact, one finds overall a much
     deeper and much more mature level of insight in a community where
     the ugliest depths of human opinion are confronted, rather than
     ignored. And the majority of the school-related content on the site
     speaks to that fact. That is our community; take it or leave it.

     4) This community, which for the above reasons has been the object
     of ongoing controversy, has given birth to some truly noteworthy
     academic studies. Just today, one of the administrators, Anthony
     Ciolli, released a working paper on the determinants of law school
     national employment placement at elite firms (available at
     [2]http://www.autoadmit.com/studies/ciolli). Another respected
     member of the community, Aaron Chalfin, this past November
     published a study on how law schools are ranked by current and
     prospective law students, which received much attention across the
     law school admissions community (available at
     [3]http://www.autoadmit.com/studies/chalfin). There is no other
     admissions discussion board on the Internet whose members possess
     such a collective body of knowledge and wisdom, and we attribute
     that to the hands-off moderating philosophy we have discussed in
     this letter.

     Anthony Ciolli, Jarret Cohen Administrators

   Naturally, I can't speak to the merits of the site (though Xoxohth was
   quite a guy, 18/00 dexterity, 16 intelligence, . . . -- or am I
   confusing him with Fafhrd), but I thought I'd post the operators'
   response.

References

   1. http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=147012&forum_id=2
   2. http://www.autoadmit.com/studies/ciolli
   3. http://www.autoadmit.com/studies/chalfin

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to