Posted by Todd Zywicki:
The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945:

   Geroge H. Nash's book, [1]The Conservative Intellectual Movement in
   America Since 1945 is a book that has long been on my reading list and
   I finally got around to reading it over the past few weeks. It is a
   really comprehensive and insightful analysis of the development of
   modern conservatism and libertarianism. In particular, Nash's key
   theme is ongoing story of the way in which disparate strands of
   thinkers have been able to be melded together into a stable
   conservative "movement". The core is the alignment of traditionalists,
   libertarians, and anti-communists into a coherent conservative
   movement. It is very reminscent of the recent David Brooks article
   that made waves, where Brooks notes that conservatism has always been
   an "ideas" movement.

   The book was originally published in the 1970s, but remains remarkably
   fresh today. A new edition appends a discussion of Reagan and the
   development of the Religious Right. The main outdated concept of the
   book is the repeated use of the concept of Gnosticism, a term I had
   never previously come across, but which apparently was a theme of Eric
   Voegelin's work.

   I think that Nash overstates the influence of the Southern Agrarian
   tradition specifically, which I think has failed to exert much of a
   force over the development of conservatism, although he does note the
   way in which it has grown into the traditionalist element of
   conservativism. Reading between the lines here, I think that part of
   what Nash is up to is trying to identify an indigenous American
   traditionalism that is not as reliant on Burke as Kirk was, and he
   finds this in the Southern Agrarians (such as Weaver). He also has an
   interesting discussion of the rise of Tocqueville's influence on
   American conservatism that I found very interesting.

   And neoconservatism comes along a bit after this book (Bill Kristol,
   for instance, is referred to as a nameless Harvard undergraduate in
   this book).

   Otherwise, the debates described in the book are remarkably fresh
   today and Nash does a great job describing them.

   Another striking element of the book is the way in which conservative
   thought was fundamentally spawned outside the academy, and of course,
   remains so today in the form of think-tanks. Even academics like
   Russell Kirk and Wilmoor Kendall ended up outside the academy. Kendall
   was an especially interesting discovery to me--I've only known him as
   a character who flits in and out of William F. Buckley's various
   novels, so it was interesting to learn more about him as my impression
   is that he has not withstood the test of time as well as some of the
   other thinkers discussed here.

   What I liked best was Nash's even-handed treatment of all of the
   various strands of the conservative movement--it is rare to find
   someone equally adept and sympathetic to people as diverse as Kirk,
   Mises, Chodorov, Nock, and Frank Meyer. The knowledge here is really
   encyclopedic. I found it a great read, very informative, and I learned
   a lot about the roots of the modern conservative movement that I
   didn't previously know from the generations that preceded mine. Nash
   places a substantial emphasis on the role of Catholics in building
   modern conservatism, and the debates within the Catholic conservative
   community.

   So, especially for the general reader interested in the roots of
   various strands of modern conservative thought (I consider myself a
   general reader in this area), I commend Nash's book.

   Nash's book is especially useful when read in conjunciton with William
   Rusher's great book [2]The Rise of the Right, which I read many years
   ago. Rusher focuses more specifically on the development of the
   conservative movement as a popular and political force, in packaging
   and retailing conservative thought. Rusher has some great stories and
   info about Goldwater, Reagan, and the National Review, stuff that I
   hadn't previously read anywhere else. Rusher also is a great writer
   and tells a great story.

References

   1. 
http://www.isi.org/books/bookdetail.aspx?id=63712811-ca24-46cb-9c5f-f94e41e87430
   2. 
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0962784125/qid=1114463644/sr=1-8/ref=sr_1_8/104-5390802-0456765?v=glance&s=books

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to