Posted by Eugene Volokh:
"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and Lesbians:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_05_01-2005_05_07.shtml#1115397536


   I'm puzzled about how the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy --
   or for that matter, any exclusion policy -- can be justified as to
   lesbians. As I understand it, the main argument in favor of such a
   policy for male homosexuals is that in all-male or nearly-all-male
   combat units the possibility of sexual tension may undermine unit
   effectiveness. I'm skeptical about this argument, but it at least
   seems plausible.

   Yet it doesn't seem to apply to lesbians, since presumably they would
   very rarely be serving in all-female units, and never in all-female
   combat units. Moreover, even if we set aside antidiscrimination
   arguments and focus solely on military effectiveness (which may or may
   not be the right approach, but let's use it here), it seems lesbians
   would tend to make better soldiers than straight women:
    1. They are less likely to get pregnant.
    2. They seem less likely to get sexually transmitted diseases.
    3. If the stereotypes about lesbians tending to act in more masculine
       ways are generally accurate -- hard to tell, for obvious
       measurement reasons, but that seems to be the conventional wisdom
       -- then that cuts further in favor of lesbians as opposed to
       straight women. Many women may well make great soldiers, but if
       we're speaking about generalities, and the military policy is
       generally defended using generalizations, I'm happy to at least
       tentatively assume (as I suspect would the military) that
       stereotypically masculine traits and attitudes tend to be more
       useful for soldiering than stereotypically feminine ones.

   Is it just that the military fears that straight soldiers will so
   dislike lesbians that this itself would cause morale problems? I guess
   that just doesn't strike me as that factually plausible. Is it that
   the military wants to treat male and female homosexuals equally, for
   fairness or public relations reasons? That seems odd: Can it really be
   that discriminating against homosexuals is just fine, discriminating
   against women (as the military long has done, and still in
   considerable measure does) is just fine, but discriminating based on
   sex among homosexuals is wrong, even when there's a perfectly sensible
   argument for such discrimination? Or is there something else I'm
   missing here?

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to