Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Careful With Those Studies:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_06_05-2005_06_11.shtml#1118090462


   [1]Dr. Jay Gordon (Huffington Post) discusses a recent study:

     Nearly every one of 253 adults asked said that their doctors should
     ask them about family stress and conflict, even when that conflict
     extended to violence.

     In contrast, only about a third of these people said that their
     doctors actually did inquire about these crucial aspects of
     physical and emotional well-being.

   And indeed the [2]summary he links to reports:

     In a survey of 253 male and female patients, nearly all (97
     percent) believed physicians should ask patients about family
     stress and conflict, and most (94 percent) thought physicians could
     be helpful.

     Despite this, only one third of the respondents remembered ever
     being asked about family conflict by their physicians.

   But if you look closely at the [3]study itself, and in particular
   [4]table 1, you see that 67% of respondents said that family doctors
   should "sometimes" ask about family conflict, and only 29% said that
   doctors should "often" ask about this. This suggests that there may
   not be much "contrast" there: 67% of respondents think that the doctor
   should only ask about this sometimes -- presumably under certain
   circumstances, though each respondent may have a different view of
   what those circumstances might be. Many doctors might well take a
   similar view, and simply conclude in many cases (whether rightly or
   wrongly) that this particular patient's circumstances don't justify
   such an inquiry.

   If the summary carries an implicit claim that doctors are being too
   reticent, and aren't doing what patients really want them to do (which
   is how I read the summary and Dr. Gordon's reference to it), such a
   claim doesn't really seem to be supported by the facts. The claim may
   still be right, but this study just doesn't really support it.

   Nothing earth-shaking, I realize; if people misread this study, we're
   not going to see [5]a disaster of Biblical proportions. But it is, I
   think, yet another a reminder to be careful about summaries of
   studies, which often omit qualifiers (e.g., "sometimes") that are
   quite important.

References

   1. 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/jay-gordon/narrowcast-medical-note-t_1939.html
   2. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=25402
   3. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/content/full/3/3/248
   4. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/content/full/3/3/248/T1
   5. http://www.moviesounds.com/ghostbusters.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to