Posted by Todd Zywicki:
Response to Dartmouth Booting:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_04_12-2009_04_18.shtml#1239888125


   George Leef ponders the larger implications of the Dartmouth Board
   majority's decision to boot me, "[1]Only Rubber-Stamps and Jellyfish
   Need Apply"" "Message to the remaining critics: 'Accept your powerless
   status and keep quiet.'"

   And Joe Malchow [2]questions the wisdom of reopening the shooting wars
   of the past few years just to settle scores:

     This action is by any measure an egregious one. Talk about
     disproportionate response: for years a small entrenched band of
     insiders on the Board and in Parkhurst have attempted to repel a
     groundswell of student and alumni sentiment in favor of better
     management practices, smarter free speech policies, more support
     for the academic departments in demand, less revulsion to the
     notion of athletics and the Greek system, and other hale and hearty
     measures Dartmouth students and alumni have supported throughout
     the ages to ensure that Dartmouth remains true to itself. Most of
     the reaction to this sentiment has been ham handed: the failed
     constitution that would have rigged the trustee election procedures
     against petition candidates; the candidacy of Sandy Alderson,
     billed as a conservative because Parkhurst presumed that those
     quintessentially Dartmouth passions were nothing more than
     right-wingerism; and finally the abrogation of the 1891 compact
     that provided for a half-elected Board. Call that the nuclear
     option. Call the dismissal of Professor Todd Zywicki the most
     cowardly post-armistice blindsiding in the history of gentlemanly
     warfare.

References

   1. http://www.popecenter.org/clarion_call/article.html?id=2158
   2. http://www.dartblog.com/data/2009/04/008588.php

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to