Posted by David Bernstein:
I'll say it if Justice Souter Won't:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_06_21-2009_06_27.shtml#1245951514


   [1]The Supreme Court today held that a school's partial strip search
   of a thirteen year old girl, including requiring her to shake out her
   undergarments, "exposing her breasts and pelvic area to some degree,"
   violated her Fourth Amendment rights. School officials were looking
   for a prescription-strength ibuprofen (which means, in effect, 2
   Advils!).

   Justice Souter, writing for the Court, stated that the majority meant
   to cast "no ill reflection" on the the school official, assistant
   principal Kerry Wilson, who ordered the search. Well, it should have.
   The combination of drug hysteria and the tyrrany of petty government
   officials is rarely a pretty sight. Unfortunately, the Court also held
   that no monetary damages could be awarded against Wilson and other
   school officials.

   (FWIW, I'm not a Fourth Amendment expert, but as a matter of policy I
   would never let school officials strip search a child. If the incident
   is serious enough to merit police attention, say because school
   officials think the student is distributing heroin, call the police
   (who, among other things, have some training in probable cause and
   restrictions on searching without a warrant) and let them handle it.
   If the incident involves, say, possession of ibuprofen, which is
   neither illegal nor dangerous but only against school policy, handle
   it some other way.)

References

   1. http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/08pdf/08-479.pdf

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to