Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Trying Too Hard?
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_08_02-2009_08_08.shtml#1249537256


   From [1]the Las Vegas Sun article that [2]I quoted below:

     He said he was not aware that any of the companies were already
     engaged in illegal activity at the time that he helped to set up
     them.

   My guess: The author or the copyeditor was enforcing some (entirely
   spurious) rule against splitting an idiom such as "set up," and as a
   result replaced a perfectly normal construction ("set them up") with a
   weird and jarring one. I wouldn't go so far as to say that "set up
   them" is ungrammatical; it's as grammatical as "set up the companies"
   would be. But it is surely unidiomatic, as a [3]Google Fight reveals;
   a search through Google News shows an even more lopsided tally, 200:1
   in favor of "set them up" rather than 20:1. I'm with [4]Horace's view
   that custom is the test of good usage, and "set them up" is customary.

   Maybe I'm wrong, and maybe "set up them" was just a spontaneous error.
   But to me it smacks of a general [5]splitophobia, raised to a new
   level.

References

   1. 
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/aug/03/danny-tarkanian-get-150000-punitive-damages-defama/
   2. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_08_02-2009_08_08.shtml#1249339694
   3. 
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=%22set+up+them%22&word2=%22set+them+up%22
   4. http://www.volokh.com/posts/1244585366.shtml
   5. 
http://open.salon.com/blog/louise_egan/2009/02/18/yes_we_can_split_auxiliaries

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to