Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Sotomayor & Corporate Rights:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_09_13-2009_09_19.shtml#1253157714


   Should the law treat corporations as legal persons? The newest justice
   may think not -- or at least that's the impression some have drawn
   from a comment she made at the Citizens United oral argument last
   week. [1]From the WSJ:

     During arguments in a campaign-finance case, the court's majority
     conservatives seemed persuaded that corporations have broad First
     Amendment rights and that recent precedents upholding limits on
     corporate political spending should be overruled.

     But Justice Sotomayor suggested the majority might have it all
     wrong -- and that instead the court should reconsider the 19th
     century rulings that first afforded corporations the same rights
     flesh-and-blood people have.

     Judges "created corporations as persons, gave birth to corporations
     as persons," she said. "There could be an argument made that that
     was the court's error to start with...[imbuing] a creature of state
     law with human characteristics." . . .

     Justice Sotomayor may have found a like mind in Justice Ruth Bader
     Ginsburg. "A corporation, after all, is not endowed by its creator
     with inalienable rights," Justice Ginsburg said, evoking the
     Declaration of Independence.

   Sotomayor's remark cheered some, but not others.

     "Progressives who think that corporations already have an unduly
     large influence on policy in the United States have to feel
     reassured that this was one of [her] first questions," said Douglas
     Kendall, president of the liberal Constitutional Accountability
     Center.

     "I don't want to draw too much from one comment," says Todd
     Gaziano, director of the Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at
     the conservative Heritage Foundation. But it "doesn't give me a lot
     of confidence that she respects the corporate form and the type of
     rights that it should be afforded."

References

   1. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125314088285517643.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to