Tellurium Copper is usually not used for a device's terminal posts but used as 
the lead wire due, as you say, for the malleability to crimp well and 
flexibility. The point I was making is to use the same interconnect test lead 
material throughout as the DUT terminal posts. The 3458A and the 732A both use 
Beryllium Copper alloy making that type interconnect lug or plug the best 
choice to minimize the dissimilar metal EMF or Seebeck voltage. The 34420A uses 
pure copper rather than an alloy terminal and for the same reason, minimal 
Seebeck voltage is realized with a pure copper interconnect. Any type of Silver 
or Gold plating on the terminal or wire will introduce the undesirable  
dissimilar metal properties, both at the plating junction and at the plating 
metal to DUT terminal.

The NI website had this chart that quantifies the Seebeck voltage best:
"When two, dissimilar metals are joined a voltage is created. This voltage is 
known as the thermal electromotive force (EMF) or the Seebeck voltage. The 
Seebeck voltage is dependent on the temperature of the junction and the 
composition of the metals joined. The specific metal-to-metal junctions result 
in specific temperature coefficients (µV/°C), also known as Seebeck 
coefficients. The following table lists the most common metals and their 
respective Seebeck coefficients."

Junction                µV/°C
Copper-Copper           <0.3
Copper-Gold             0.5
Copper-Silver           0.5
Copper-Brass            3
Copper-Nickel           10
Copper-Lead-Tin Solder 1-3
Copper-Aluminum 5
Copper-Kovar            40
Copper-Copper Oxide     >500

Granted, Gold and Silver are the next best choice, and is certainly why they 
are satisfactory, but using either warrants a more critical temperature 
gradient issue. If your measurements were satisfactorily convincing, than you 
probably had no appreciable junction temperature differences. 

Don Johnson

-----Original Message-----
From: volt-nuts [mailto:volt-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of acb...@gmx.de
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 5:37 AM
To: Discussion of precise voltage measurement
Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] 732A and Prologix received

I have used the pomona spades, mainly to interface the low emf pomona banana 
cables to binding posts. I have stopped this, reasons being, they are large and 
worse, that the pomona spring loaded insulation tube that covers the banana 
plug conductor uses such a strong spring that slowly the plug works its way out 
of the spade. this btw also happend to me when I used the pomona low emf 
binding posts together with the pomona low emf banana cables. overall I m not 
happy with these. 
so, due to lack of options, I changed to self-made twisted shielded pair of 
high grade teflon/kapton silver plated copper cable with gold plated copper 
spades (crimped). I use them not only with the 3458a but also with nanovolt 
meters. these have higher resolution and accuracy in low level measurements 
than the 3458a. emf voltages were never an issue with these cables if properly 
used. I have posted some results doing 34420a stabilty measurements on the pmel 
forum, and the results are convincing (purpose was actually not to test the 
cables but the stability of the 34420a, but the emf issue is a part of this of 
course. we use the 34420a to do low voltage precision measurements on thermal 
converters where the full scale signal sometimes is 1mV). 
that btw also relates to don's statements below, I do not concurr with his 
comments about copper telurium as cable and spade material and so on. this 
material, as stated here many times, is used because it is machinable, for 
copper spades one would not use it. the 34420a factory cable uses copper cable 
and copper spades, not telurium-copper. if there was a problem, it would be 
worse with the 34420a than with the 3458a because of its low level ranges. and 
again, I have not seen any problems in a chain of (output to input):
1.copper-tellurium post from e.g. 8 digit calibrator 2.crimped copper spade, 
gold plated 3.silver plated tsp copper cable 4a.crimped copper spade to 
copper-tellurium post or 4b.soldered copper connector(34420) my consistent 
results over more than a year using them.



> Gesendet: Montag, 25. August 2014 um 06:33 Uhr
> Von: "Orin Eman" <orin.e...@gmail.com>
> An: "Discussion of precise voltage measurement" <volt-nuts@febo.com>
> Betreff: Re: [volt-nuts] 732A and Prologix received
>
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Don@True-Cal <truecalservi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Randy & all,
> >
> > You have correctly concluded that some (maybe not all) of your measurement
> > problem is thermal EMF being added or subtracted in series within your
> > measurement interconnect. This thermal EMF is generated at the junction of
> > dissimilar metals when accompanied with thermal gradients between the test
> > lead and device terminals. You have to eliminate both the dissimilarity of
> > the metal junctions as well as minimize the thermal differences. The
> > terminals of the 3458A as well as the 732A are Beryllium Copper so you want
> > to use the same test lead terminals. Forget the typical Tin plated lugs or
> > even Gold plated as both are not Beryllium Copper and constitute dissimilar
> > metals. The best solution (as usually the most expensive) is to use a set
> > of
> > Fluke 5440A-7005 (48") cables. I also have just as good results using the
> > much more flexible Pomona 11174A (lugs end always stay connected to the
> > 732A) or 11058A with more convenient shielded banana plugs. The Fluke cable
> > has the added Guard built in but be sure to also use a Guard lead with the
> > Pomona cabled. The Guard lead does not need to be low thermal EMF. DIY
> > cables is usually not a good idea because the lead wire to terminal also
> > constitutes just as critical of junction. The above cables use Tellurium
> > Copper wire which is usually hard to find and hard to crimp properly and
> > NEVER solder.
> >
> 
> 
> 11058A and 11174A are discontinued at Keysight.  However, Pomona 5295 spade
> to banana cables are available (5295-36 at Mouser et al) and claim that
> they are designed to minimize thermal EMFs.  Datasheet is here:
> http://www.mouser.com/ds/2/159/d5295_1_01-51722.pdf  Any comments on these
> as an alternative?
> 
> Orin.
> _______________________________________________
> volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to