Mark,

 

Please contact us directly. We will provide the version you purchased, this is a company policy.

 

Take note we need your VCI number (customer ID). We will check your profile and based on your last support plan, provide you with the then current version and patches.

 

Thanks,

 

 

Robert Button

Director Customer Support

Vircom

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Eckert
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 2:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOPmail Beta] Windows 2003 with vopmail 5.1

 

Thanks for this. 

 

We have set it up on a test server for now and it seems to work well BUT we now have a small problem.  Looks like we have deleted our webmail download during a recent cleanup, and worst of all our license key can’t access the download section on Vircom’s website Anymore. Something about buying a support plan.

 

Is this right ?  We have to buy a support plan for a package we have already bought ? and have had running for over 12 months ?

 

Doh !

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Suneel Jhangiani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 19 September 2003 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOPmail Beta] Windows 2003 with vopmail 5.1

 

Modus Mail also runs slightly faster.

 

Suneel.

 


From: Dave Berzins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 September 2003 16:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Works like a charm.  Faster in my opinion.  Been running it this combo for about a month now in production.


Dave Berzins ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
President, Nucleus Inc.

 

1835B 10 Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T3C 0K2
Phone: (403) 209-0000  Direct: (403) 313-7790 Fax: (403) 541-9474
www: http://www.nucleus.com

 

Nucleus is ... Everything Internet!

----- Original Message -----

From: Mark Eckert

Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:47 AM

Subject: [VOPmail Beta] Windows 2003 with vopmail 5.1

 

Hi All,

 

Does anyone have any experience with running Vopmail 5.1 on Windows 2003 ?   I am thinking of upgrading my 2000 server as 2003 seems to be much faster on the few systems I have experienced it with.

 

Are there any known issues ?

 

Does it run better or worse ?

 

Thanks in Advance

Mark Eckert

IT Universe Pty Ltd

Melbourne, Australia

Reply via email to