Jed, "That is a little unclear. I mean:
I cannot describe the details, but the gist of it is, I.H. thinks that Rossi's calorimetry is badly done and his conclusions are invalid. Experts from outside of I.H. have examined the calorimetry and they told me they agree with I.H.
As I said before, this dispute is about calorimetry and _nothing else_. If I.H. thought there is excess heat, they would happy to pay the $89 million. If they do not pay, they get no IP and they write off the $11 million. Why would they do that if they think the machine works?!?"
Did anyone tell you why it was "bad"? It doesn't seem too complicated to measure. Was it the power input, the water input or the steam output?
I find it very hard to believe one could make an error of x50.
