Jed Said: "No, as I told you several times, I pointed to the paper Penon published on the internet. In my opinion, it shows he is an idiot. You can read it yourself. Perhaps you will disagree."
My issue is the evaluation of what was done before the contract was signed and what was done after it was signed and the reasons for those acts. Why was JED who is renowned for his expertice in LENR testing not consulted before the test was contracted? If IH has 89 million and and additional billion on the line via this contract, why wasn't the top man in the field contacted for his opinion about the ERV. If the ERV is the sole arbiter of the validity of the technology, evey warm body including Jed should have be contacted. It sounds like IH ask Rossi for his recommendation, and Rossi supplied Penon. This does not make sense to me. If IH intended to meet the terms of the contract, they should have done more due diligence. Instead, they made Penon the only person with the authority to make a judgement in this test. Penon in effect became Jubge Judy in this arbitration between Rossi and IH. *Judge Judy* is an American arbitration-based reality <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_show#Arbitration-based_reality_court_show> court show <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_show> presided over by retired Manhattan <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan> family court <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_court> Judge Judith Sheindlin <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Sheindlin>. The show features Sheindlin adjudicating real-life small claim <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_claims_court> disputes within a simulated <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation> courtroom set. All parties involved must sign contracts agreeing to arbitration <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitration> under Sheindlin. Once the contract is signed, Judge Judy is given absolute legal authority in the case at hand. When the verdict is rendered by this Judge, the issue is legally resolved. The plaintiff cannot say that Judge Judy is an idiot and plaintiff is not bound by what she says. NO, the issue at hand is adjudicated. It does not matter who or what Penon is, he was given the authority by the two parties involved in the contract to make the judgement and his decision is absolute. On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Your statements,including label people as idiots, based on information >> you say is confidential . . . >> > No, as I told you several times, I pointed to the paper Penon published on > the internet. In my opinion, it shows he is an idiot. You can read it > yourself. Perhaps you will disagree. > > Please stop repeating false statements. > > It is not a question of taking sides. >> > Gluck has taken sides! He presents Rossi's point of view only. He attacks > I.H. and me, even though he has not heard the technical arguments by I.H. > yet. > > >> IH have provided very little information and has been vague in general, >> maybe exemption for communication with you. >> > Then you must wait for I.H. to provide more information before you try to > judge who is right. That's all I am saying. > > >> I think Rossi needs a chance to prove his claims. >> > Yes, he does. You have to wait to see his technical presentation as well. > You cannot simply believe he is getting 50 times input just because he says > so. > > >> It amazes me that IH does not clarify the situation if th >> ey have water tight argument. >> > It amazes me that you keep repeating this nonsense. I.H. cannot clarify > the situation in public at this time, because they have to respond to a > lawsuit. That is how lawsuits work. The lawyers tell both sides to shut up > until the dockets are filed. > > I.H. will lose $89 million if they fail to file the arguments, or if their > arguments are not water-tight. So you can be sure they working hard to > prepare convincing argument. > > You should note that Rossi did not present any data in defense of his > claims. That should tell you something. > > - Jed > >
