Why did IH allow Penon to remain the ERV if he was incompetent or dishonest? Why did IH allow the test to continue with a flawed calorimetry plan? Why wasn't the calorimetry design changed to the satisfaction of IH early on in the test? Did you ash your contacts at IH these questions? What did they say? As Rossi claims, why was everything OK until it was time to pay the money?
The story that IH is spinning does not line up yet. More info is required about the way IH monitored the test. They seem to be disinterested during the test. Did IH confront the ERV about their concerns? Did they prepare any documentation describing their concerns? If this documentation exists, get its ID so it can be located in the trial docket. On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jed States: >> >> "If the ERV say in court that he thinks the terms were met, he should >> pack his bags and take the first airplane for Italy as soon as he leaves >> the stand, to avoid being arrested for perjury and fraud." >> >> This judgement seems to be very harsh, cruel, damaging, and severe. This >> statement causes >> me to wonder what the basis of this hostile feeling about a complete >> stranger comes from. There is no case made to support this reaction and no >> logic that leads to it. >> > > Yes there is a case to be made for this, but you have not yet seen it. You > will have to wait to see what I.H. presents before you can judge. > > Think about it for a moment. Rossi says the machine is producing 50 times > input. I.H. says it is producing no heat. One of them has to be drastically > wrong. Completely, utterly mistaken, and grossly incompetent. Or, perhaps, > fraudulent. There is no middle ground here. > > As you know, I think I.H. is right and Rossi is wrong, based on what I > know of the calorimetry. Therefore, I think Penon is either stupid or he is > taking part in a fraud. I cannot tell which it is. Either way, he will be > in trouble if he says it works, because any licensed HVAC engineer they put > on the stand will have to testify that Penon is drastically wrong. Unless > that engineer is willing to lose his license, he or she will have to say > that. Rossi and Penon will be in trouble whether they are sincere or not. > They will look bad. The authorities will suspect they are engaged in a > fraud if they testify to something that every genuine expert says cannot be > true. > > > >> As far as my opinion on the law that applies in this case, I simply want >> to go on the record with an opinion based on logic and research. >> > > This is about calorimetry. No information about the calorimetry has been > released. There is no record for you to go on, and nothing for you to > research. There is nothing for you apply logic to. You cannot do > calorimetry by ESP. You have to look at actual facts. All of the "facts" > you have presented here are either irrelevant or made up and false. > > > >> How you reach your feelings appears to be based on hearsay from one of >> the parties in this dispute. >> > > Several parties, with good confirmation. > > > >> You seem to be inured to the self >> serving motives that might produce this information from such people. >> > > I do not think there is any motivation for I.H. to throw away $11 million > for no reason. If they thought it worked, they would pay for it. > > - Jed > >
