Eric-- Thanks for that correction. I was reading the original agreement. I assume the difference between 4 and 6 was only a matter of fine tuning for Rossi.
The agreement indicated the requirement to identify the control procedures to operate the E-Cat. What those procedures specify will be of interest relative to the achievement of a COP of 6 that you have identified as the higher performance required to earn the $89M. Those controls may be the real indicator of the science behind the E-Cat. Bob Cook From: Eric Walker Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 8:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: LENR and the feline nature of the E-Cat Hi, On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: I would note that all the Agreement called for is a COP of 4. The second amendment to the agreement modified this detail to stipulate, as I understand it, a graduated payment for a COP between 2.6 and 6, with the full $89 million being owed at 6 or higher. Eric [1] http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0001.4.pdf
