Jed,
Since you are in communication with someone that
is linked to I.H. maybe you can answer a few questions.
1) Is I.H.'s finding that the 1 MW e-cat plant
produced no heat (COP <1) based on the very same
data set that Rossi used to determine that the
COP was greater than 50? Is the COP error a
direct miscalculation of the data or is the error
based on how the data was obtained, i.e., the
wrong type of sensors, placement of the sensors, etc.
2) Were any of I.H.'s COP findings based on
sensor readings that Rossi didn't use or have access to?
3) Did I.H. receive a communication every 3
months regarding the operation and performance, as Rossi has indicated?
4) If they did indeed receive the 3 month
communications, when did I.H. determine that something was amiss?
5) Reading the contract it says that I.H. can
make suggestions about the performance and
operation of the plant, did I.H. ever make any
comment to Rossi that the plant wasn't performing
as required and ask him to make changes?
6) How well do you know the person(s) that have
provided the information from I.H.? I only ask in
that you seem very sure that the information that
you have seen is accurate. If they are someone
that you don't know very well, can you be certain
that the information being given you is indeed accurate?
Thanks,
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 08:35 PM 5/14/2016, you wrote:
Axil Axil <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
Â
Jed or another could negotiate the COP down but
by how much is the question. 50 is really high to come down from.Â
I cannot negotiate anything. I have no standing
in this and no role. I am not a professional
HVAC engineer licensed in Florida, so no lawyer
and no court would ask my opinion. If anyone
did, that is all I would say: "I am not a
professional HVAC engineer licensed in Florida."
Putting aside all of that, the COP is less than
1. The machine produces no excess heat. That is
what I.H. experts concluded. The COP is not 50,
not 6, not 4, not 1.1. It is less than 1. There
is no heat. That is why I.H. said it was not
"substantiated." That's all there is to it.
If the court accepts the judgment of
professional experts who say there is no excess
heat, then the case will be thrown out of court.
End of story. That is what lawyers have told me.
Mr. Pretend Lawyer Axil disagrees, but that is what actual lawyers say.
- Jed
