----- Original Message ----- From: "Jed Rothwell"

As to the technical question, is this some form of cold fusion, Kim suspects it might be and I gather so does McKubre. Storms disagrees. He thinks there is no connection between the Taleyarkhan effect and cold fusion. I cannot judge, but anyone can see that it is "mostly" hot fusion.

Hot fusion?   Brian Ahern told me this:

"I certainly do not believe the thermally based sonofusion claims because I understand a term called (thermal diffusivity). It is physically impossible to generate the temperatures that people calculate [for the necessary time interval] because they neglect this aspect of heat transfer. The shock wave densification may have some merit, but thermal solutions are non-sensical."

I agree with Brian that purely thermal solutions based on 3-space mathematics (and clocking) are non-sensical - and that there is MORE going on in sonofusion than a thermal (i.e. Lawson criteria) thing, while at the same time - this is not cold fusion either. Yet, there is a possible resolution based on time-dimensionality.

Once again - we should not fall into the logical trap of "either/or" - even if we must resort to a whole new category of fusion - and yes - there are many who have been suggesting for a long time that we have this third category, which includes the so-called "warm fusion".

Even then - that may not be enough categories as there are experiments on the fringe between warm and hot. The Farnsworth Fusor fits in there. Almost everyone thinks of it as "hot," not warm, yet it is operating at an order of magnitude lower in temperature than the textbook "threshold" for hot fusion.

And so-called warm fusion may be two orders of magnitude lower yet, depending on how "close" you think you can make an accurate temperature measurement.

Boltzmann's "tail" is one resolution to these quandaries of classification - but another unappreciated and simpler resolution to them is "time".

That is, "time" in the sense of an extra dimensions of time, existing at very tiny focal dimensions, so that in effect we find that when a very high but fleeting temperature gain, which is caused by "shock wave densification" appears to have a longer effective confinement duration then it should if a "clock" in 3-space were doing the timing. IOW in these situations, time seems to "stand still" <g>

Jones

Reply via email to