I saw a good summary on related Kozyrev mirrors. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9hwXoCrEUs
In my experiments any spiral where the number of turns is in the form of n minus a fraction of n, so 2 minus 1/2 = 1.5 turns The next is 3 minus a 3rd (2.666 turns) and so on produces a strong effect. On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 at 14:38, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Rick, my body surfing friend. Good to hear from you. > > You know, I never did plant those macadamia seeds. I have them still. > > I look forward to examining your supposition when I have the time. > > Have you read that Tibetan monks can lift heavy stones with sound? > > I will try to look at this tomorrow. > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023, 9:49 PM <r...@highsurf.com> wrote: >> >> EVOs, HUTCHISON, AND ANCIENT MEGALITHIC TECH >> >> >> >> Hi all, long time. Sorry about the length of this, hope some of you will >> take a moment to look through it. Warning: contains significant speculation >> and some video links, (no affiliation to links). >> >> >> >> For some time I've been fascinated by anomalous ancient stone working >> techniques. The spread of information on the subject over the last couple of >> decades due to the internet and video, TV like Ancient Mysteries, Graham >> Hancock etc., has exposed the public to the fact and depth of these >> mysteries despite the ever-present overburden of academic resistance, grift, >> and woo. >> >> >> >> There's been lots of theories over the years of sound, geopolymers, aliens, >> etc., and more lately, some sort of electromagnetic effect. Conditions in >> and around rock crystals are often affected by both EM and sound, perhaps >> not always through just piezoelectricity. Browns gas has also been proposed >> as a cutting technique since the melted surface containing transmutations >> has been found in some samples of the vitrified cut surfaces from various >> ruins which are similar to BG-burned samples of the same material. >> >> >> >> Although these proposed theories do lean towards explanations for cut and >> finish, the big elephant in the room is still on the loose: how did they >> *raise* and *transport* these damn things? Another slightly smaller elephant >> is the almost capricious manner with which numerous large and repeated cuts >> were made both at quarries and in removed material - it was easy for them. >> That last one often doesn't become so apparent until you've been looking at >> this for a while and can see the larger context of the total extent and >> volume of this work globally, as well as within individual sites. >> >> >> >> I've had some ideas about this, and in the last few years I've actually "cut >> metal" and casually tried something. I got weak but interesting results, and >> I'd like to refine the experiment and keep careful records before discussing >> particulars publicly, but to the point of this post: >> >> >> >> There's a video out on YouTube now under the "Versadoco" account: >> >> >> >> https://youtu.be/884rjnOSnbI >> >> >> >> Some ideas that I think are new to the megalith mysteries are presented >> there which might seem familiar to Vortexians - Ken Shoulders' EVOs, and the >> softening, melting, and occasionally levitation effects described by John >> Hutchison. >> >> >> >> The best explanation is the one that addresses the unknown causes for *all* >> the features of a phenomenon, and for the moment, this one looks pretty >> interesting to me. I noticed long ago how dried pottery clay in rehydration >> will mimic features of some Hutchison effect samples where they soften, >> split and crumble distinctively before melting. In clay it's water molecules >> soaking in between the grains and ionically defeating the small bonds >> between them. In Hutchison's materials, is it EVOs or excess free charge >> content accumulated around the grains? In the stone artifacts, that could >> explain effects attributed by some to Brown gas since accumulated charge or >> EVOs are also present. >> >> >> >> Still missing is the practical method for EVO/charge generation the >> mysterious masons actually used, which if known, should be easily duplicable >> since there is an implied low-tech nature to this. The video fumbles and >> punts on that crucial topic, IMO. But at least there's no need for aliens or >> complex high tech. >> >> >> >> I speculate that powerful (i.e. LOUD and long duration) acoustics were used >> for charge generation (or more likely acquisition from the environment), and >> manipulation and concentration through cymatics, hopefully without JH's >> personal presence required as some have suggested. With large stones >> containing a gigantic internal space charge you might be able to cut and >> shape them with copper tools using Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM)*, >> then raise and transport and them using the enormous electric fields from >> all that trapped charge coupling (against) the ground plane. Resonate, chop, >> float, stack, discharge. If true, big implications for various modern >> industries, obviously. >> >> *Here's a link to a practical modern example of using EDM on a pre-charged >> dielectric instead of the usual current-connected metal target material. >> Internal charging is via linear accelerator (kinetic not acoustic), but a >> simple manual bulk EDM-style technique is shown. Scroll down to the video: >> https://www.etsy.com/shop/Criticalelectron?ref=mini_mfts_name&listing_id=1464572835 >> >> >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> >> - Rick >> >>