Papp Engine vs PAGD:
 
http://www.aetherometry.com/papp_engine.html
 
"Both systems employ a sudden (and catastrophic) electric discharge. Papp followed the model of the internal combustion (IC) engine, with the high-pressure spark igniting the inert gas fuel. In the PAGD, the 'spark' consists of a diachronic cluster of auto-electronic emission sites that fail to sustain a vacuum-arc. The electric discharge is not accessory, as it is in the Papp technology; rather, it is constitutive of the technology by its physical characteristics, including the autogenous pulsation. It is, in fact, the method whereby the 'vacuum-state' is tapped. The PAGD discharge is a low field auto-electronic emission that directly generates the electron plasma from a cathode that can be treated as fuel [9]. This has a deep parallel with the Papp engine, where the explosion is, in our view, driven by the formation of an electron plasma emitted from the inert gas mixture - which must thus be treated as the fuel proper (see below). The basis for th! e presence of anomalous cathode reaction forces in the Papp combustion, stems, in our view, entirely from the (quasi-solid) conditions that permit autoelectronic emission from inert gases. "
 
I sure backed into that one.  :-)
 
Fred
----- Original Message -----
From: Frederick Sparber
To: vortex-l
Sent: 5/1/2006 3:22:57 AM
Subject: Re: Hydrino orgone

A standard 4 foot (122 cm long) T-12 1.5 inch (3.8 cm diameter) fluorescent
bulb at 5 Torr Argon pressure should contain ~ 2.46e20 Argon atoms.
or ~0.025 eV /atom with a 1.0 joule energy input. pulse.
About the same eV/atom at 300 degrees K ambient temperature.
Sounds a bit like the PAGD doesn't it?
There could be H2O vapor in the bulb already?

Reply via email to