Oh I think I understand at last your reasoning: in this case in your view energy is conserved because the field energy decreases while the kinetic energy increases. Whereas in the case of the two permanent magnets _both_ the field energy and the kinetic energy increase, so you think there is a net gain of energy. Do I interpret correctly your line of thought?
Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michel Jullian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:07 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics >I suppose that's one way to look at it. Does this allow you to find E - E' ? > > Michel > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 5:14 AM > Subject: Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics > > >> Michel Jullian wrote: >> > Ok, electric then. Can you draw energy more than >> once from the coulombic attraction of >> a charged body of say +1 coulomb accelerating towards >> a fixed equal and opposite charge? I >> mean for example: >> > >> > - How much energy E do you retrieve by releasing it >> from 1m away and stopping it 1cm >> away? (say converting 100% of it's KE to heat) >> > >> > - Which energy E' must you expend to bring it back >> 1m away so you can retrieve E again >> from the system? >> > >> > - What's the net energy E - E' pumped per cycle? >> > >> > Michel >> >> >> >> It's the same as an electro-magnetic in that energy is >> moved. Two oppositely charge and >> attracted objects accelerating toward each other >> cancel each others E-field. So the >> E-field energy is moved to KE. >> >> >> Regards, >> Paul Lowrance >> >> >> >> ____________________________________________________________________________________ >> Never Miss an Email >> Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started! >> http://mobile.yahoo.com/services?promote=mail >> >
