Michel Jullian wrote:
> Temporary energy, which you can retrieve once but have to expend
> entirely to be able to retrieve it once more.


Under normal circumstances, yes. Note that I've stated from the start of this thread that it's "temporary energy". On the other hand, read my previous posts regarding anti-matter colliding with matter. In such a case *it is possible to keep such energy.* :-)




> Well, we seem to agree entirely after all. No overunity on a full cycle can be got from
> the fundamental forces. No PMMs of the first kind can work.


We agree, but take note this discussion never had anything to do with overunity. It has to do with the fact that standard physics has no idea where the energy comes from in the case of the electrons magnetic dipole moment. Energy is clearly manifesting as two magnets accelerate toward each other. Standard physics cannot see, probe, poke, touch such PE. Again, the point is that we can glimpse where such energy comes from when studying two attracted accelerating electro-magnets.




> As to the origin of this one time energy, it's known IMHO, it's the work performed by > the fundamental force, like when you push your car the KE of the car is equal to the work > of your pushing force, what else? So the real mystery is the fundamental force which does
> the work in fact, whether gravitational, electric or magnetic.


Such energy is unknown regarding the electrons magnetic dipole moment. One day we'll known, but for now it's just magic PE, lol. Again, the electro-magnet clearly demonstrates the energy comes from whatever sustains the magnetic dipole moment. For now physicists simply add the energy in the equations and call it PE. Obviously we are not *required* to know where it comes from. The point is such energy exists and we have yet to find the reservoir. Obviously the energy exists, in the case of two magnets accelerating, and the fact that it requires appreciable amount of energy to create such particles. So it requires energy to create the electron and such energy is still there.

Regards,
Paul Lowrance

Reply via email to