Please include his full name-- Harry Paul. Anyhow, was this an accidental
effect H.Paul discovered or was it a prediction by means of physics or is it an
offshoot of another "free energy" machine?
Paul Lowrance
Terry Blanton wrote:
> Paul had never been able to drive an electrical load before. With
> such small torque, the motor would stall due to loading once even the
> smallest current was drawn from the generator. PM generators load a
> source even when open circuited due to core attraction and Lenz effect
> eddy currents. The loading is heavy at coil core edges resulting in
> an effect called cogging.
>
> With the Ecosmart generator he had to sand down the coil core edges to
> minimize cogging. I also suggested that he "lift the rotor" of the
> generator so that it is not entirely inserted within the stator PM
> field.
>
> Finally, it would run open circuited on a two magnet rotor but stalled
> once a current demand was added. So, Paul put on the four magnet
> rotor which gave the additional torque. Based on power measurements
> this configuration had a COP of over 3.0, INCLUDING THE GENERATOR
> INEFFICIENCY.
>
> Terry
>
> On 5/17/07, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> One overriding question...
>>
>> Why are there two Pringles left?
>>
>> No seriously ...why the focus on the small bulb? Assuming that it is not
>> self-powered yet, what difference could the bulb make?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Terry Blanton wrote:
>> > Paul just posted a new video on youtube:
>> >
>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H07vGnZot0
>> >
>> > It shows a four magnet rotor and a generator driving a load. The
>> > energy per pulse did not change but the COP did (upward as would be
>> > expected).
>> >
>> > Better hurry, I don't know how long the BoD will allow it to remain.
>> >
>> > Terry
