I thought it read well, Jed. Go for it.
Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Jed Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, this is good. This is what I was looking for. No doubt they will be > swamped with millions of letters, but perhaps mine will get through. It is > worth sending an e-mail. > > I have put on hold the idea of publishing this letter on LENR-CANR.org > because there is no interest on the part of researchers and I do not want it > to appear under my name alone. The researchers have credibility, but I do > not. > > Below is the latest and probably last version of the letter, which I just > posted to this website. I hope there are no typos, although I suppose it > would look more authentic if there were. > > Ed Storms contributed to this but I take full responsibility for it. If > there are mistakes or assertions people do not agree with, he is not to > blame. I think he is happy with the statement about "temperatures and power > density." > > - Jed > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > I call your attention to a source of energy that has been largely ignored, > but has huge potential: cold fusion (the Fleischmann-Pons effect). > > This is a fusion reaction between deuterium atoms in solid materials. Over > the last 20 years, it has been explored in laboratories world-wide and found > to be much more efficient and cheaper than the conventional plasma fusion > (ITER) method. It has produced thousands of times more energy per gram of > fuel than any chemical reaction, and it can probably generate millions of > times more. In some experiments, it has reached temperatures and power > density comparable to the core of a conventional fission reactor. > > This method is still not sufficiently understood to be scaled up or > commercialized, but the potential is great. Government funding is needed to > help achieve this understanding. Senior researchers at National > Laboratories, the U. S. Navy and other government laboratories have done > outstanding cold fusion research in the past, and they would like to do > more, but they have not been adequately funded. > > Technical details about cold fusion, including hundreds of peer-reviewed > scientific papers from mainstream journals, can be found at this website: > > http://lenr-canr.org/
