FWIW, Steorn's home page recently posted what I believe is a new You-Tube promo where they have interviewed several engineers from the Orbo Evaluation and Development Unit. What interested me were comments coming from some of the engineers, specifically that they have measured up to 300 percent OU. They go on to state that the margin of error is so far out of the ball park that it can't be due to measurement error. One evaluator said the device simply needs someone to take it by the "scruff of the neck" and work with it.
It's been my personal policy to remain neutral on the Storn issue - as much as I possibly can. The only personal observations I'd like to interject here is the fact that listening to these engineers I came away with the feeling that they truly believe they have witnessed OU. Whether they really have is, of course, what continues to be debated, and rightly so. At present the main reason I remain doubtful of the OU claims is based on personal conjecture that if Stoen's team really has been able to repeatedly finesse up to 300% OU why haven't they been able to develop some kind of a demonstration contraption that clearly demonstrates a closed loop system in action. Can someone please refute me on the following conjecture: Surely it's possible to develop SOME kind of a prototype that is capable of exploiting 300% OU. Again, Such a device doesn't have to be pretty, and it certainly doesn't have to be economically viable. Proving economic viability is not the point. Proving OU actually exists IS the point. All the device has to show to the skeptical world is the fact that it proves unequivocally that it can self-sustains its own momentum - with a tiny bit of excess energy left over to spare. If they could just assemble something as simple as that - all bets would be off. I'm still waiting. So is Mongo. Stay tuned. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
