What they are selling... http://www.steorn.com/skdb/oedu/
Harry > >From: John Berry <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Tue, November 23, 2010 4:51:34 PM >Subject: Re: [Vo]:Steor has a new promo at their web site > >The problem is that they say 300% but they don't say 300% of what? >300% of a few milliwatts? 1 watt? 10 watts? 100 watts? > > >On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]> wrote: > >Some of the people in this latest video have appeared in earlier Steorn videos. >> >>Harry >> >> >> >> >> >> >>----- Original Message ---- >>> From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson <[email protected]> >>> To: Vortex <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Sun, November 21, 2010 2:47:29 PM >>> Subject: [Vo]:Steor has a new promo at their web site >>> >>> FWIW, >>> >>> Steorn's home page recently posted what I believe is a new You-Tube promo >>> where they have interviewed several engineers from the Orbo Evaluation and >>> Development Unit. What interested me were comments coming from some of the >>> engineers, specifically that they have measured up to 300 percent OU. They >>> go on to state that the margin of error is so far out of the ball park that >>> it can't be due to measurement error. One evaluator said the device simply >>> needs someone to take it by the "scruff of the neck" and work with it. >>> >>> It's been my personal policy to remain neutral on the Storn issue - as much >>> as I possibly can. The only personal observations I'd like to interject here >>> is the fact that listening to these engineers I came away with the feeling >>> that they truly believe they have witnessed OU. Whether they really have is, >>> of course, what continues to be debated, and rightly so. >>> >>> At present the main reason I remain doubtful of the OU claims is based on >>> personal conjecture that if Stoen's team really has been able to repeatedly >>> finesse up to 300% OU why haven't they been able to develop some kind of a >>> demonstration contraption that clearly demonstrates a closed loop system in >>> action. Can someone please refute me on the following conjecture: Surely >>> it's possible to develop SOME kind of a prototype that is capable of >>> exploiting 300% OU. Again, Such a device doesn't have to be pretty, and it >>> certainly doesn't have to be economically viable. Proving economic viability >>> is not the point. Proving OU actually exists IS the point. All the device >>> has to show to the skeptical world is the fact that it proves unequivocally >>> that it can self-sustains its own momentum - with a tiny bit of excess >>> energy left over to spare. If they could just assemble something as simple >>> as that - all bets would be off. >>> >>> I'm still waiting. So is Mongo. >>> >>> Stay tuned. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Steven Vincent Johnson >>> www.OrionWorks.com >>> www.zazzle.com/orionworks >>> >>> >> >> >> >
