Sorry for the prior accidental post with no new content.
On Dec 28, 2011, at 3:55 PM, [email protected] wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:17:21
-0900:
Hi,
[snip]
It is notable that the
radioactive isotopes of these elements tend to have nonzero nuclear
magnetic moments.
...notable perhaps, but hardly surprising. Pair forming results in
stability,
hence nuclei with unpaired particles tend to be less stable, i.e.
frequently
radioactive. Pair forming also results in cancellation of magnetic
moments
(which is the very reason for the stability in the first place).
[snip]
Yes of course, hardly surprising.
I should have said *why* it was notable. I added: "This increases
their chances of attracting a deflated hydrogen, and thus transmuting
into a stable isotope."
This tendency
provides some degree of explanation for the mysterious tendency for
2H, 4H, and 6H transmutations, where none exists otherwise. Here “H”
means any isotope of hydrogen.
...I assume you mean that none otherwise would exist within your
theory. Hydrino
molecules provide at least one other explanation for particle
pairs, and Axil's
notion of entanglement may provide another (though it rubs me the
wrong way ;).
Good point. I changed the statement to: "This tendency provides some
degree of explanation for the mysterious tendency for 2H, 4H, and 6H
transmutations, where none exists otherwise in published theories, as
noted by Storms."
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
