On Dec 29, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Complete nonsense.
I like your candor! 8^)
The monitor used by Rossi's team in January is specifically
designed to detect positrons, which must be there if there is to be
H+H fusion. None were detected.
Yes. I stated this in my article:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/NiProtonRiddle.pdf
All other forms of fusion with nickel produce radioisotopes of
varying half-lives - easy to detect - which Rossi himself claims
are absent, and no test has found them either.
Not true. Did you see my reaction set and their justification?
Once again - there is ZERO evidence of fusion. And for that matter
- there is no evidence for any known nuclear reaction.
Jones
How about the detection of gammas by Celani on start-up and shut
down? Celani is credible. The gammas admittedly could be faked.
From: Jed Rothwell
There is no evidence it isn't. No one has checked, as far as I know.
Really? The highest quality testing which was performed in Bologna was
radiation monitoring.
You would not catch cold fusion Pd D+D reactions with this. They do
not produce radiation. I presume H+H would also not produce
radiation. I presume it forms deuterium, which is difficult to look
for, because it is ubiquitous. I do not know anyone working with Ni
+H who has looked for it.
- Jed
Metal + H can create heavy transmutations. These should be far more
probable than hydrogen plus hydrogen reactions, provided the species
of hydrogen involved have zero net charge, or less. See:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MileyGHreviewoftr.pdf
and for some amusement on the side:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MalloveEalchemynig.pdf
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
