In 1980, CBS launched a advertising campaign for their hit show "Dallas"
featuring the catch phrase "Who Shot JR." The last show of the season was
going to reveal the culprit who shot JR. In England, where you can bet on
just about anything, officials refused to allow people to bet on the
outcome of this because it was not a random event and the outcome was
already decided. Someone might read the script, or or one of screenwriters
might place a large bet.

Along the same lines, long ago I decided not to make predictions or bets on
the future of cold fusion, because the script is already written. Events
were largely a matter of choice. That is, free will. Rossi and many other
researchers are sitting on results that they could reveal if they chose to,
which would profoundly change the outcome, and the whole course of human
history. On the other side, people in high places at the DoE or the APS
choose to remain ignorant of this subject. Like Mary Yugo and Robert Park,
they have made a decision to read nothing. Perhaps they want to maintain
"plausible deniability."  Who knows? The point is, they can type "LENR.org"
into a browser anytime. There is nothing stopping them. There are no longer
barriers blocking access to information.

Fifteen years ago, if you wanted to learn about cold fusion or some other
technical subject, you had to go to a university library, or ask
experts. You had to make an effort, and spend time and money. The physical
reality of getting books and papers and the fact that these papers were
only available in university libraries precluded easy access to
information. It was easy to see that most people would not make the effort
to learn about cold fusion, especially in view of the opposition to it and
the nonsense in the mass media. Now, you type a few keystrokes and world of
knowledge opens up. It is like the miracle described by Matthew 7:7: "Ask,
and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be
opened unto you . . ." Now, the only thing stopping these people is their
own mind. I will not try predict people's thoughts.

Free will is a complicated subject. It may exist, or it may be an illusion
we feel because we inhabit mammalian predator brains. Inhabiting the brain
of an honey bee would feel very different, I suppose. Perhaps making a
decision or coming up with a new idea is is the result of random processes.
At the deepest level, these events may be governed by quantum mechanics, so
they are completely random and cannot be predicted even in principle.
Whatever the situation is, a decision by Rossi to allow a test, or a
decision by the editor at a journal or Washington Post to allow the truth
about cold fusion to be published are acts of human will. One decision by
any one of hundreds of people could change the situation overnight, like a
wind-blown snowball that triggers an avalanche. The situation is unstable
and poised for catastrophic change. That does not mean a change is
inevitable. Snow that might trigger an avalanche might also melt away
peacefully.

There is nothing in the known universe as complicated and unpredictable as
the human mind. I try to influence people's thoughts & actions but I do not
try to predict them. The present and future of cold fusion is entirely
governed by free will. In the past cold fusion could not be controlled. We
did not know enough about it. It was still an open question as to whether
it *could be* made practical. We did not know. Now, the scientific
mysteries have been cleared up enough that we can be certain. The effect
can be made practical. It can be commercialized. It can prevent global
warming and save millions of lives. There is no longer any doubt about
that. Whether that will happen or not is entirely a matter of choice.

- Jed

Reply via email to