Jed, you're too much. Enough balonium already. First, you make two assumptions:
1. That Climatologists are NOT being threatened or harassed 2. That they are NOT being bribed, that they are driving 20 year old Toyotas and that they have not been photographed with money in their mouths. My question to you is: How do you know any of these? When you haven't met any one of them. OH OK.... I get it, you have not heard of this happenning to any of them so it must not be happenning. OK, I have some land in Florida that I would like to sell to you. Perfect vacation spot. LOL .... Then, after you've made your fallacious assumptions above, you then proceed to assume that they are true and argue that because these are not happenning, then they must be telling the truth. OK Whatever. Is anybody, other than our resident expert who studied under Feynman, buying this logic? Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: Jed Rothwell To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 6:51 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell Zell, Chris <[email protected]> wrote: In regard to the power of the international banks and their scofflaw privileges, the extreme nature of the situation is kept out of the mainstream press. . . . Take the case of Andrew McGuire - who made the mistake of trying to expose silver trading manipulation by JP Morgan. Not only was his evidence ignored, but shortly thereafter his car was violently plowed into by another vehicle. . . . Is this enough? I have more..... Global warming is a legitimate concern but the hype comes from powerful people with vested interests. It is not enough. You would have to show that hundreds of professional climatologists are being threatened or harassed by these vested interests the way McGuire was. Is that happening? Or, I suppose, you would have to show they are being bribed. I have not met them, but my guess is that they drive 20-year-old Toyotas. They probable have not been photographed with money in their mouths: http://duanegraham.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/romney-bain-capital-money-shot.jpg So if there is no harassment and no money shots . . . these researchers are doing nothing unusual. No ominous undertones or conspiracies. They are publishing papers because they believe in their data and their models. They are doing what any scientists do. It happens their conclusion have grave implications for the planet and the economy. They can't help that. Have the climatologists complained about being harassed or threatened? I have not heard that. They complained forcefully about the accusations that they were fudging the data in the UK. They are not reticent to complain about their critics. I guess they would not hesitate to report harassment or people crashing into their cars. Cold fusion researchers complain about harassment all the time. Just about every one of them has experienced this and they are never reticent to tell me about it. - Jed
