Allow me to restate and clarify specifically. For example, by effectively acting as a capacitor or a battery, if 500 watts of input power is used to create the spark per each discharge with little heat having been produced, the popper must act to preserve the input current in part or in total through electronegative ionization in the form of a resultant feedback current.
In the engine design by Papp, he used this feedback current to power the spark discharge of the next cylinder in the firing chain. In the Papp engine, the magnitude of this feedback current might have been greater than the current that produced the spark discharge in the first place under certain noble gas mixtures. This increase in the feedback current might well be one of the contributors to over unity power generation in the Papp reaction. This may also be the reason why the Papp engine exploded during the R. Feynman demo when an unchecked positive feedback current loop was formed between the various cylinders when the circuit that controlled the current feed to these cylinders was disabled. Because of this positive current feedback, an increasing positive spark discharge current feedback loop having been directly supported by a gainful feedback current from other various cylinders in previous cylinder activations might have produced a series of plasmoids of increasing strength. It was this uncontrolled gainful current loop that eventually culminated in an explosive disintegration of the Papp engine after a few moments of unregulated operation when the control circuit was disabled after R. Feynman pulled the plug to the control unit. The relatively long delay in the time between the removal of the plug by Feynman and the onset of piston failure and its explosion points to a slow buildup of the strength of the feedback current and not an sudden explosion caused by a abrupt decompression of the reaction gases. Cheers: Axil On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:02 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It is reasonable to expect that the feedback current when added to the >> energy exerted in the vigorous movement of the piston will comfortably >> exceed over unity energy production expectations. >> > > Eh? >
